|
|
|
|
For Immediate Release |
Contact: Eric
Wagner (213) 747-7606, ext. 4427 |
|
CIVIL RIGHTS
ORGANIZATIONS CALL FOR EFFORTS TO OVERCOME FLAWS IN NEW REDISTRICTING PROCESS
CREATED BY PROP. 11 |
|
|
LOS ANGELES, CA – In the aftermath of the narrow passage of Proposition 11, five of the nation’s leading civil rights organizations today called on proponents of the measure to ensure that California carries out its new redistricting process in a fair, open and accountable manner. The Asian Pacific American Legal Center (APALC), the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund (LDF), the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF), the National Association of Latino Elected Officials (NALEO) Educational Fund, and the William C. Velasquez Institute (WCVI) vigorously opposed Proposition 11 as a flawed initiative that would impede genuine redistricting reform. The organizations are seeking an implementation plan which addresses the serious problems created by flaws in the measure, including the prospect of a new redistricting commission which lacks gender, ethnic, or geographic diversity; a two-pronged redistricting process which will impede public participation; and problematic redistricting criteria which foreseeably jeopardizes minority electoral opportunities. “We believe Proposition 11 increases the risk of minority communities being divided during the redistricting process,” stated Stewart Kwoh, President and Executive Director of APALC. “Accordingly, the goal of all involved going forward should be to secure procedures that mitigate the negative impact of Proposition 11 on California’s minority communities.” “We are disappointed that California’s voters approved Proposition 11,” said John Payton, President and Director-Counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund (LDF). “Proposition 11 is a fatally flawed redistricting measure because it does not protect the core values of diversity, accountability, and inclusion. While we will vigorously advocate for an inclusive process, we recognize that Proposition 11 will harm the ability of minority voters to elect a candidate of choice and reduce diversity in the redistricting decision making process.” “MALDEF opposed Proposition 11 because it risks turning back the clock on important electoral gains only recently made in minority communities,” said Nancy Ramirez, Western Regional Counsel. “We are closely monitoring its implementation to ensure that the voting rights of the Latino community are adequately protected.” “Proposition 11’s proponents offered assurances that the measures would not have a detrimental impact on the political progress of the state’s underrepresented communities,” stated Arturo Vargas, Executive Director of the NALEO Educational Fund. “As the state moves forward to implement the initiative, we will hold the proponents accountable for these promises, and we are willing to work with them to overcome the barriers of transparency and public participation created by Proposition 11. The proponents must support procedures that will provide for the wide recruitment of commissioner candidates from California’s diverse communities. They must work for the coordination of the commission and state legislative line-drawing processes to ensure meaningful public participation in redistricting hearings.” “Proposition 11 changed the redistricting rules just as minorities started making gains in the State Legislature,” said WCVI President Antonio Gonzalez. “It will make it more difficult for historically disenfranchised Californians to participate in the process and threatens minority representation. Prop. 11 proponents repeatedly stated they would help guard against this scenario and WCVI will be holding them accountable.” |
|
|
### About
Asian Pacific American Legal Center About
NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund About
Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund About
NALEO Educational Fund About
William C. Velásquez Institute |
|
|
© 2008 National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed
Officials (NALEO) Educational Fund |
|